Natural Resources 332

Introduction to Ethics and the Environment

 

Fall Semester 2007 (4 credit hours)                                       

Tues. and Thurs., 10:10-11:00                                                           

14 Fernow Hall                                                                                                                      

Jim Tantillo, Instructor                                                            Taza Schaming, Teaching Assistant               

Office: 101-A Rice Hall                                                                      Office: 312-G Fernow Hall

            Phone: 254-5479                                                                     Phone:

            Email:  jat4@cornell.edu                                                         Email: tds55@cornell.edu

                                                                                                           

A.        OVERVIEW OF THE COURSE

 

This course is an introduction to ethics, epistemology, aesthetics, and political philosophy as these subjects relate to the environment.  The first half of the course will cover normative ethics and theoretical approaches to ethics such as consequentialism and deontology.  We will examine in some detail the arguments for ÒrightÓ and ÒwrongÓ in a variety of moral contexts, including the types of moral thought experiments for which philosophers are famous—or infamous, depending on your point of view. (Would it be ethical to throw a person off a lifeboat to save five others? Or is this an absurd question given the low probability of ever being in such a situation?)

 

While formal ethical theorizing is undoubtedly important for thinking clearly about ethical issues, some philosophers have argued that modern moral theory is limited in its usefulness or applicability to real-life moral contexts.  Michael Stocker refers to the ÒschizophreniaÓ of modern moral theories, and we will try to understand his complaint about academic ethics as it is ordinarily practiced in the analytic, Anglo-American philosophical tradition.  This is our focus in the first half of the semester.

 

After fall break we will then consider virtue ethics as an alternative to modern moral theorizing and investigate the implications of virtue ethics and human happiness for our treatment of the environment.  Should we all live like Thoreau?  Or is Michael PollanÕs garden ethic a better example of environmentally sound living?

 

Furthermore, as Pollan suggests, normative ethics also carries with it political significance.  Joseph Sax for example says that our government-run National Parks should make us Òbetter peopleÓ and argues that non-motorized recreation is environmentally virtuous.  We will consider MillÕs argument in ÒOn LibertyÓ that the only justification for interfering with peoplesÕ freedom is to prevent harm, and we will evaluate SaxÕs thesis in light of MillÕs Òharm principle.Ó  What is the appropriate role of government in affecting and/or changing peopleÕs environmental attitudes and behaviors?

 

Finally, the course concludes with an example of applied ethics in the form of Elizabeth TelferÕs article on the pleasures of eating and drinking.  Telfer questions whether we have any obligations to feed the hungry, if we have obligations to animals not to eat them, and whether we are justified at all in devoting so much of our human energy to the enjoyment of food and to other aesthetic pleasures. What are humans here on this planet to do?  What does it all mean? What is a good life?  These are some of the questions that will occupy us this semester.

 

One of the course objectives is to foster in students what Bertrand Russell once referred to as Òarticulate hesitation.Ó  In An Inquiry into Meaning and Truth, Russell wrote:

 

Here, as usually in philosophy, the first difficulty is to see that the problem is difficult.  If you say to a person untrained in philosophy, ÒHow do you know I have two eyes?Ó he or she will reply, ÒWhat a silly question! I can see you have.Ó  It is not to be supposed that, when our inquiry is finished, we shall have arrived at anything radically different from this un-philosophical position.  What will have happened will be that we shall have come to see a complicated structure where we thought everything was simple, that we shall have become aware of the penumbra of uncertainty surrounding the situations which inspire no doubt, that we shall find doubt more frequently justified than we supposed, and that even the most plausible premises will have shown themselves capable of yielding implausible conclusions.  The net result is to substitute articulate hesitation for inarticulate certainty.

 

 

B.        EXAMS, PAPERS, AND PARTICIPATION

 

(1) Exams.  We will have an in-class mid-term exam on Thursday October 11.  This will be an open notebook exam: you are allowed to have with you your reading outlines from the Kagan book, as well as any lecture notes you might have taken.  A final exam will be given during the regular exam period, although I have not decided if it will also be open notebook.  Both exams will consist of essay-type questions. Students requiring a make-up exam must speak to the instructor by 8/31/2007.

 

(2) Short Papers.  Students will write three short papers (approx. 1200-1500 words each) on topics assigned by the instructor and/or determined in consultation with the instructor and/or teaching assistant.  These papers will be graded by the teaching assistant. Students are encouraged to resubmit a revision of the first paper if appropriate.  There will be grade penalties for late papers: 1/3 letter grade off per each day late, no paper accepted after six days late.  You are required to submit one hard copy of each paper and also to upload your papers electronically at http://canuck.dnr.cornell.edu/dnr_web/ntres332 .

 

(3) Weekly outlines.  Students are required to submit typed outlines with notes on selected readings each week, for example on each chapter of KaganÕs Normative Ethics as assigned.  These outlines will be collected in discussion sections and returned to you the following week with the T.A.Õs comments, and they will contribute to your overall discussion participation grade.  These outlines will also be your resource for the open-notebook exams, so work diligently on them!

 

(4) Discussion participation. Weekly discussion sections are required. Please bring the appropriate weekÕs reading to section each week.

 

(5) Short in-class writing exercises may be assigned as well.  These are designed to help you develop the writing skills you will need to do well on the essay exams.

 

(6) Class weblog: I have set up a weblog at http://ntres332.blogspot.com/ . Participation on the blog is not required but certainly encouraged.  Particularly active participation on the blog will be noted and will contribute to your final class participation grade.

 

 

C.        GRADING

 

(1) Mid-term exam: 25%

(2) Final exam: 25%

(3) Short papers: 25% 

(4) Section discussion participation and reading outlines: 25%

 

This is a four credit course and may be taken on an S/U basis.

 

 

D.        COURSE MATERIALS

 

Required Books to Buy:

 

Kagan, Shelly.  Normative Ethics.  Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1998.

 

Mill, John Stuart.  On Liberty and Other Essays.  Ed. John Gray.  NY: Oxford University Press, 1991.

 

Pollan, Michael.  Second Nature: A GardenerÕs Education. NY: Grove Press, 1991.

 

Sax, Joseph.  Mountains Without Handrails: Reflections on Our National Parks. Ann Arbor: Univ. Michigan Press, 1980.

 

Thoreau, Henry D. Walden and Civil Disobedience.  Ed. Michael Meyer. NY: Penguin Classics, 1985.

 

Suggested, optional books to buy:

 

Seech, Zachary. Writing Philosophy Papers, 4th ed.  Wadsworth.  A copy of this book will be on course reserve.

 

Required Course Packet:

 

There will be a required course packet available for purchase at the Cornell Campus Store.

You are expected to bring a copy of each required reading to discussion section as assigned.

 

 

E.  ACADEMIC INTEGRITY

 

You are expected to be familiar with University regulations regarding plagiarism and other violations of the academic integrity code: see http://cuinfo.cornell.edu/Academic/AIC.html. For example, when writing papers you may consult with other students and help each other refine ideas, style, grammar, etc., but the basic ideas and writing of your paper must be your own.  Remember that academic integrity is fundamental to the entire university enterprise, and penalties for violating academic integrity can be severe.

 

 

 

 

 

F.  SCHEDULE OF READINGS

 

Introduction: What Is Philosophy?

 

Week One: Introduction

First day of classes, Thursday 8/23

Reading: In lieu of Week One discussion period, required showing of the film The Truman Show, Friday afternoon 8/24 at 2:30 pm, Fernow 14

Suggested: Stanley Cavell, ÒThe Thought of MoviesÓ

 

Week Two: Preliminaries

August 27 – 31

Readings: Sober, ÒPhilosophical Problems for EnvironmentalismÓ (handout in class)

            Kagan, Normative Ethics, chap. 1, ÒIntroductionÓ

 

 

Part One: Normative Ethics

           

Week Three: The Good / Consequentialism /Hedonism

Sept. 3 – 7

Readings: Kagan, Normative Ethics, chap. 2, ÒThe GoodÓ

            Mill, Utilitarianism, Chap. 2, ÒWhat Utilitarianism IsÓ

Suggested: Griffin, Well-Being

           

Week Four: Doing Harm / Deontology

Sept. 10 – 14

Readings: Kagan, Normative Ethics, chap. 3 ÒDoing HarmÓ

            Thomson, ÒKilling, Letting Die, and the Trolley ProblemÓ (course packet)

Foot, ÒThe Problem of Abortion and the Doctrine of Double EffectÓ (course packet)

Suggested: Kant, Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals

            Feinberg, Harm: The Moral Limits of the Criminal Law

 

Paper assignment #1: Question to be assigned on Òharm,Ó due Tuesday September 25

 

Week Five: Other Constraints : Lying

Sept. 17 – 21

Readings: Kagan, Normative Ethics, chap. 4 ÒOther ConstraintsÓ

            Kant, ÒOn a Supposed Right to Lie From Benevolent MotivesÓ (course packet)

            Wood, ÒRelativismÓ (course packet)

Harry Frankfurt, ÒOn BullshitÓ (course packet)

 

Week Six: Further Factors: Charity, Rights

Sept. 24 – 28

Readings: Kagan, Normative Ethics, chap. 5 ÒFurther FactorsÓ

            Susan Wolf, ÒMoral Saints,Ó Stable URL: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0022-362X%28198208%2979%3A8%3C419%3AMS%3E2.0.CO%3B2-0

 

 

Week Seven:  The Limits of Ethical Theory

Oct. 1 – 5

Readings: Murdoch, ÒThe Sovereignty of Good Over Other ConceptsÓ (course packet)

Nagel, ÒFragmentation of ValueÓ (course packet)

            Michael Stocker, ÒThe Schizophrenia of Modern Moral Theories,Ó Stable URL: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0022-362X%2819760812%2973%3A14%3C453%3ATSOMET%3E2.0.CO%3B2-G

Strongly Suggested: Kagan, Normative Ethics, chap. 6-7, ÒTeleological FoundationsÓ and ÒDeontological FoundationsÓ

Suggested: Stanley Rosen, The Limits of Analysis

            Bernard Williams, Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy

 

Fall Break Oct 8 – 9

 

Mid-term exam in class, Thursday October 11  (open notebook)

 

 

Part Two: Perfectionism and The Virtues

 

Week Eight: Visions of Virtue

Oct. 10 – 12 (shortened week—one class: mid-term exam)   In lieu of discussion section this week: required film showing, 2:30 pm Friday October 12, Groundhog Day , location TBA

Readings: Kupfer, Joseph H.  ÒVirtue and Happiness in Groundhog Day,Ó pp. 35-60 in Visions of Virtue in Popular Film (course packet)

            Aristotle, excerpt from Nichomachean Ethics (course packet)

Suggested: Jewett, Robert. "The Deadly Deception of the Flesh in Groundhog Day." Chapter 6 in Saint Paul Returns to the Movies: Triumph over Shame, pp. 88-103.

           

Paper assignment #2: Topic to be assigned, due Tuesday October 23

 

Week Nine: How Should I Live? Thoreau and Perfectionism

Oct. 15 – 19

Readings: Thoreau, Walden, editorÕs introduction, chaps. 1-4

            Philippa Foot, ÒVirtues and VicesÓ (course packet)   

Suggested: Cunningham, ÒReading for Life,Ó chap. 3 of The Heart of What Matters: The Role for Literature in Moral Philosophy

 

Week Ten: Thoreau and Perfectionism continued

Oct. 22 – 26

Readings:  Thoreau, Walden, remainder of book

Suggested: Hurka, Perfectionism

Kekes, Moral Wisdom and Good Lives

            Iris Murdoch, ÒThe Idea of PerfectionÓ

 

 

Part Three: Environment: Ethics and Tensions

 

Week Eleven: Humans in Nature—Hands On or Hands Off?

Oct. 29 – Nov. 2

Reading:  Michael Pollan, Second Nature: A GardenerÕs Education

Suggested: Evernden, The Social Creation of Nature

 

Week Twelve: John Stuart Mill, Individualism and Liberty

Nov. 5 – 9

Readings: John Stuart Mill, On Liberty

            Himmelfarb, ÒEditorÕs IntroductionÓ to On Liberty, Penguin edition (course packet)

            Coglianese, ÒImplications of Liberal Neutrality for Environmental PolicyÓ (course packet)

Suggested: Cahn, Environmental Deceptions

            Sher, Beyond Neutrality: Perfectionism and Politics

 

Week Thirteen: Joseph Sax, Mountains Without Handrails

Nov. 12 – 16

Reading: Joseph Sax, Mountains Without Handrails

Suggested: Sagoff, ÒCan Environmentalists be Liberals?Ó

 

Paper assignment #3: Contrast and compare MillÕs On Liberty and SaxÕs Mountains Without Handrails, due Tuesday November 27.

 

Week Fourteen: Thanksgiving Week

Nov. 19 – 21 (shortened) one class

Reading: Telfer, Elizabeth, "The Pleasures of Eating and Drinking." (course packet)

Suggested: Telfer, Food for Thought: Philosophy and Food

 

 

Thanksgiving Break Nov. 21 – 23

 

 

Part Four: Conclusion

 

Week Fifteen: Conclusion

Nov. 26 – Nov. 30

Readings: Watson, ÒThe Identity Crisis in Environmental PhilosophyÓ (course packet)

Reread: Sober, ÒPhilosophical Problems for EnvironmentalismÓ (handout)

Suggested: Weston, Toward Better Problems

            Kirkman, Skeptical Environmentalism

 

 

Final Exam: Exam Period U, Friday, December 14, 2:00 – 4:30 pm. Students requiring a make-up exam must speak to the instructor by 8/31/2007.

 

Last day of exams: Dec. 14