|
Identification Information |
||
Plan Component
|
Definition |
|
Landowner information
|
||
Plan preparer information
|
||
Plan preparation date
|
The date that the plan was presented to the landowner for acceptance (to be placed on the title page of the plan). |
|
Legal description, or directions to site
|
A description of how to find the site; i.e., plat survey information, tax book information, or specific written directions to the site (to be placed on the title page of the plan). |
|
Stewardship acres
|
The number of acres covered by the plan. |
|
Landowner goals for the property
|
A list of the landowner’s goals for owning the property. |
|
Regional/subsection national hierarchy information
|
Location of the property in relation to the
national ecoregional map developed by |
|
General property description
|
A property overview giving general location, major forest types, general landforms, relevant descriptions of the landscape, potential fire and insect & disease problems etc. (usually one paragraph). |
|
Interaction with surrounding properties
|
||
Map of the property
|
An aerial photo, drawing, or map that contains stand delineations, roads, boundaries, water, etc., clearly and adequately labeled. Include legend, north arrow, and scale bar. |
|
|
Known
threatened and endangered species |
Review statewide database for possible presence of threatened and endangered (T&E) species (state and Federal listings). If T&E species are present, suggestions should be made for their protection and habitat enhancement. If no T&E species are found, note this in the general description or stand description. |
|
|
Cultural
heritage databases checked (if available) or field observations noted |
Many states have cultural databases that list archeological or other cultural sites of importance that should be noted in the plan. If nothing is found just note it. |
|
|
Soils
information |
Describe how soils may affect the attainment of landowner goals. (Can be generalized over the entire property when soils are uniform.) |
|
|
Descriptive Information |
|
|
Plan Component |
Definition |
|
Stands
by cover type and area (acres) |
A description of forest stands in terms of cover type and acreage. |
|
Description
of dominant vegetation |
List trees by species and size class within the stand. |
|
Stand
characteristics, based on a reliable field inventory |
A reliable field inventory is any sampling technique that will provide similar results when replicated in the same place. This item is not scored separately but is apparent from the following 6 items. |
Stand age |
The general age of a stand, as determined by measurement or growth models. |
|
Stand
health |
A statement describing the health and condition of the forest, including noted problems such as insects, diseases, site hazards, fire, or stocking. |
|
Site
quality |
A statement describing the site capability for supporting forest growth and associated flora and fauna. Examples include site index, Habitat Type Classification System, etc. This should be expressed in technical terms along with terms the landowner can understand. |
|
Stocking |
|
|
Stand
volume |
An expression of the amount of usable wood that is contained in the standing trees, expressed as board feet per acre, cords per acre, cubic feet per acre, or tons per acre. |
Timber quality
|
A statement indicating the quality of the timber (high, medium, low, or cull). |
Growth rate
|
The growth produced by the forest on a /acre/year basis, measured by increment borings, growth models, or permanent CFI plots. Expressed as a unit growth/acre/year or as a percent of the residual stand. |
|
Stand
history |
A statement regarding the past use of the stand. Sources of information include the landowner, observation, old photos and neighbors. |
|
Integrated
items |
For a landowner interested in enhancing his/her land in a particular use, this will be a fundamental, well-developed part of the stewardship plan. In cases where the landowner’s interests do not include enhancing the property’s other potential uses, the plan should still offer the landowner a brief description of “what might be” if all options were pursued. No
matter what the landowner’s goals are, the following 5 potential use items
should be discussed. |
|
Habitat
and wildlife use |
The
potential use of the stand by wildlife, as well as ways to minimize any
negative impacts on wildlife of management activities. |
|
Water
quality issues |
A
statement addressing any water quality issues that might be occurring in the forest
and suggestions for optimizing impacts of management activities on water
quality. May include references to BMPs or AMPs. |
|
Timber
production potential |
This
requirement can be met by including a non-technical description of the site’s
relative potential; for example: “The
combination of climate, soils, drainage, and topography present here result
in a site well suited to tree growth and timber production.” Although timber production may not be the
owner’s first priority, this will communicate available options to |
Recreational opportunities
|
Recreational use is one of the primary goals of
forest owners in the Area. Development of trails, vistas, feeding stations,
hunting areas, and fishing piers are some of the practices that have been
recommended in plans. In some areas, sites will have little to no recreation
potential, in which case an acknowledgement of that would be appropriate and
sufficient. |
|
Important natural features |
The amount of description needed to satisfy this requirement will depend on the particularities of each site. Dramatic viewscapes, rock formations, waterfalls, scenic meadows, rivers, streams, etc., if present, should be described and taken into account in plan formulation. A site that has no particular features that distinguish it from other sites can be described in the following manner: “Beyond the description provided above, this property or ownership does not have any particular natural features requiring additional mention.” |
|
Recommendations |
|
|
Plan Component |
Definition |
|
Long-range silvicultural objectives
(Desired Future Condition) for each forested cover type or stand |
Describe clearly and succinctly the silvicultural objectives (Desired Future Condition) of each stand as they relate to the landowner’s goals. This component predicts the stand vegetation 50-200+ years into the future. |
Management Unit Analysis Table |
Summarizes stands
(management units) by area, site class, cover type, description, management
objectives, and recommended management activities; see following example. |
|
Schedule for completion of
prescribed activities |
A schedule for and descriptions of prescriptions and activities that will take place over the next 5 years or 10 years to achieve long-range objectives. See the following Activity Schedule example, which illustrates the form to use for either 5 or 10 years of activity. Must include enough information to meet the landowner’s needs. Does not need to reach the level of detail contained in project plans; however, landowner should be able to visualize the necessary work. May include effects on habitat, aesthetics, estimated cost, etc. Under the minimum standards, only 5 years of activity is required. |
Management Unit Analysis Table - Example
Mgmt Unit
|
Acres |
Site Quality |
Cover Type |
Description
|
Management Objective |
Management Activity
|
|
1 |
8.0 |
Dry to moderately moist |
Mixed hardwoods |
Reverting old field, white oak, sassafras, black cherry, and black walnut |
Prepare site; plant white pine and red oak; fence to protect seedlings from deer. |
|
|
2 |
4.4 |
Dry to moderately moist |
Oak-hickory |
White oak, black oak, chestnut oak, hickory, and small sawtimber |
Regenerate to higher value hardwoods |
Treat grapevines; treat culls; establish desirable regeneration; harvest timber. |
|
3 |
16.0 |
Dry to moderately moist |
Mixed hardwoods |
Reverting old field, red maple and yellow poplar |
Convert low value hardwood unit to white oak and red oak |
Prepare site; plant white oak and red oak; fence to protect seedlings from deer. |
|
Schedule
for Prescribed Activities - Example |
|||
|
Landowner: Smith Planning Horizon: 10 years Date: August 12,1999 |
|||
|
ACTIVITY LOCATION Unit
Numbers |
PRIORITY |
TIME PERIOD |
ACTIVITY |
|
9 |
1 |
Fall 1999 |
Maintain fence to protect seedlings until white pines are over 5 feet tall. |
|
9, 10, 6, 5, and 4 |
1 |
Fall 2000 |
Develop trail access. |
|
1 and 8 |
2 |
Spring 2000 |
Prepare site, plant white pine and red oak seedlings, and fence to protect from deer. |
|
4 and 5 |
1 |
Winter 2000 |
Treat grapevines, and do crown-touching release of timber crop. |
|
Communication |
|
|
Plan Component |
Definition |
|
Summary paragraph from landowner profile that evaluates landowner’s available Time, Interest, Money, and Energy (TIME) |
The TIME element is a useful tool for both the plan preparer and the landowner. Including it in the stewardship plan gives the landowner a clear understanding of the assumptions made by the plan’s author in its preparation – assumptions that, if incorrect, could impact on plan implementation. “Landowner prefers to do the work himself over a long period of time” or “Cost share programs are of strong interest to the landowner and will be vital in the completion of these practices” are examples of appropriate statements. Plan preparers may devise their own system for assessing landowner’s capabilities. |
|
Easy-to-follow
logical format |
The plan is formatted in such a way that the reader
can logically follow the flow of ideas, and will understand what should be
completed and why. |
|
The
writing style is easy to read and understand. |
Readability is subjective, but most people can agree on a well-written plan. |
|
The
writer avoids wordiness, jargon, and mistakes in grammar and spelling. |
A missing comma, mis-capitalized word, absent parentheses, some use of jargon, a misspelled word, or incorrect grammar should not result in a “Not Acceptable” rating. If the plan on the whole contains few errors of this nature, it should be rated as successfully meeting this element. |
|
The
plan meets the landowner’s needs and provides useful advice in a skillful
way. |
While this is probably the most subjective of the elements, the peer review/consensus process should be able to resolve any conflicts of opinion. |
|
The
plan is likely to inspire the landowner to action. |
Does the plan meet or exceed the landowner’s expectations? Does it help the landowner better appreciate the potential of the property and inspire action to fulfill that potential? Reviewers should consider their ratings for the previous three elements in rating this standard. |