|
Forest Stewardship Plan |
|
Identification Plan
Component |
Yes / No
|
Rating
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Excellent
|
Good
|
Acceptable but Needs Improvement
|
Not Acceptable
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Landowner name, address,
and phone number |
R
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Plan preparer name,
address, and phone number |
R |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Plan preparation date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Legal description,
or directions to site |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Stewardship acres |
R |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Landowner goals and
supporting stand objectives |
R |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Regional/subsection
national hierarchy information |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
General property description |
R |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Interaction with surrounding
properties |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Map with property
boundaries, cover types, water, roads, etc., clearly and adequately
labeled |
R |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Known threatened and
endangered species |
R |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Cultural heritage
databases checked |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Soils information
(can be generalized over entire property when soils are uniform) |
R |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Description |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Stands by cover type
and area (acres) |
R
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Description of dominant
vegetation, including tree species and size class |
R |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Stand characteristics,
based on a reliable field inventory that includes the following: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Stand age |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Stand health |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Site quality |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Stocking |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Stand volume |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Timber quality |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Growth rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Stand history |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Water quality
issues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Timber production
potential |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Recreational
opportunities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Important natural
features |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Recommendations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Long-range silvicultural objectives for each forested cover type or stand
are clearly stated and are related to landowner goals. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Schedule for completion of prescribed activities
for the next 5 years |
R
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Schedule for completion of prescribed activities for the next 10 years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Communication |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Management Unit Analysis Table that summarizes stands (management units)
by area, site class, cover type, description, management objectives,
and recommended management activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Summary paragraph from landowner profile that evaluates landowner’s available
Time, Interest, Money, and Energy (TIME) |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
The plan information is presented in a logical format that is easy to
follow. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
The writing style is easy to read and understand. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
The writer avoids wordiness, jargon, and mistakes in grammar and spelling. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
The plan meets the landowner’s needs and provides useful advice in a skillful
way. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
The plan is likely to inspire the landowner to action. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
R =
Required federal standards
Note: To qualify for funding under
phase 3, all the R requirements have to be met in addition to 70%
of the additional standards. |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Minimum Requirements met: |
|
|
Yes |
No |
|
|
||||||||||||
|
70% of additional standards met: |
|
|
Yes |
No |
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Definitions for New Standards: |
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Yes = Excellent, Good, or Needs Improvement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
No = Not Acceptable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||